3.8 Review

What have we learned about health effects more than 40 years after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident? A scoping and process review

Journal

RISK HAZARDS & CRISIS IN PUBLIC POLICY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 129-158

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12258

Keywords

cancer; epidemiology; fetal, maternal and child health; nuclear accident; process review; scoping review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The worst commercial nuclear accident in US history occurred at Three Mile Island in 1979, leading to the first large-scale voluntary evacuation due to a nuclear event. This accident had a significant impact on the mental health of nearby residents, especially pregnant women. Despite long-term follow-up and research on cancer outcomes, community concerns persist. This study reviews the fetal/maternal/child health and cancer outcomes of the TMI accident and compares them to subsequent accidents such as Chernobyl and Fukushima. The findings highlight the need for long-term follow-up, preaccident protocols, and inclusion of vulnerable populations and perceived risks.
The worst commercial nuclear accident and the first large-scale voluntary evacuation due to a nuclear event in United States history took place at Three Mile Island (TMI) in 1979. Within a short time, there was a well-recognized impact of the TMI accident by public health officials and academicians upon mental health of nearby residents- particularly pregnant women. Despite long-term and detailed follow-up of this population for cancer outcomes, community concerns continue. Herein, we conduct a scoping and process review of fetal/maternal/child health (MCH) and cancer health outcomes, and consider the findings in light of subsequent accidents. The process evaluation is enhanced by unpublished transcripts of the Pennsylvania Department of Health's (PA DOH) TMI Advisory Panel on Health Research Studies (APHRS), comprised of experts from prominent US research institutions. Research and process strengths included a rapid initial house-to-house health census of over 35,000 individuals, intense medical record reviews, in-person interviews of pregnant women within a 10-mile radius, and coordination of multiple parallel studies by PA DOH with APHRS collaboration. Major limitations include (1) errors in causal inference, (2) limited radiation exposure assessment, (3) failure to include TMI never-exposed groups in risk estimates, (4) exclusion of vulnerable populations, (5) nonindexed/never published investigations, and (6) government-stated need for long-term MCH follow-up that was never conducted. Lingering unaddressed actual and perceived risks were identified as major common themes among TMI, Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents. These findings underscore the need for the establishment of mechanisms to ensure long-term follow-up and preaccident protocols designed to address major health issues with inclusion of vulnerable populations and perceived risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available