3.8 Article

Increases in cannabis use and negative emotions during COVID-19 pandemic among college students with cannabis use disorder

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1533256X.2022.2145067

Keywords

Anxiety; cannabis; cannabis use disorder; college students; COVID-19 pandemic; depression; marijuana; mental health

Categories

Funding

  1. College of Social Work at Ohio State University
  2. Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation
  3. Center for Psychedelic Drug Research and Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis use and emotional well-being among college students with CUD, revealing a correlation between increased cannabis use and CUD symptoms, negative consequences, and negative emotions during the pandemic.
Using cross-sectional baseline measurements from a longitudinal cohort study, we evaluated the perceived impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on cannabis use and emotional well-being among college students meeting cannabis use disorder (CUD) criteria (N = 150). Compared to before the pandemic, participants retrospectively reported an increase in cannabis use during the first phase of the pandemic when stay-at-home orders occurred, which was correlated with a greater number of CUD symptoms and cannabis use-related consequences since the pandemic began. Reporting greater frequency of cannabis use during the pandemic was associated with greater frequency of using amphetamine-type drugs and consumption of cannabis by dabbing since the pandemic began. There were significant differences in cannabis use-related outcomes as a function of negative emotions (e.g., feeling lonely/stressed/anxious/depressed) experienced during the pandemic. The findings elucidate the impact of the pandemic on cannabis use among college students with CUD and can inform prevention/intervention efforts in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available