3.8 Article

Electrical properties of alkali-activated materials against Portland cement

Publisher

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/jcoma.20.00017

Keywords

materials technology; recycling & reuse of materials; sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A first attempt was made to compare the electrical properties of pastes and mortars prepared from alkali-activated materials and Portland cement. The study examined electrical conduction, dielectric constant, dielectric permittivity, and loss tangent factor. The results showed that fly ash-based geopolymer and Portland cement specimens had similar electrical properties. Metakaolin and slag-based geopolymer specimens also had similar electrical properties but with lower conductivity than the other two types. The study also confirmed the similarity in electrical properties between pastes and mortars.
A first attempt was made to study the electrical properties of pastes and mortars prepared from the most common alkali-activated materials against those of Portland cement (PC). The properties included electrical conduction, dielectric constant, the real part of dielectric permittivity and loss tangent factor. The frequencies measured ranged from 100 MHz to 3 GHz. The most common starting materials such as slag, fly ash (FA) and metakaolin (MK) were used and activated with sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solution to prepare geopolymer pastes and mortars. After curing, the specimens were tested under compression to determine the compressive strength. In addition, electrical properties were measured. The results showed that FA-based geopolymer and PC specimens exhibited similar electrical properties. MK- and slag-based geopolymer specimens also exhibited similar electrical properties but with lower conductivity compared with the other two types. The results also confirmed similar electrical properties of pastes compared to mortars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available