3.8 Article

The pink bias: Consumption choices of pink-colored products

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL FASHION MARKETING
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 187-205

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2022.2152072

Keywords

Pink-colored products; sexual orientation; consumption context; utilitarian products; hedonic products

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research explores the impact of heterosexual orientation on men's product choices in different consumption contexts and confirms the existence of a "pink bias" that leads to avoidance of pink-colored products due to gender-related prejudice. The findings demonstrate that men tend to avoid consuming pink-colored products, especially in public circumstances, as it may lead to exposure of their sexual orientation and association with femininity. However, pink-colored products may find success among heterosexual males if exclusively used in private settings.
The purpose of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the role of the heterosexual orientation on men's product choices in different consumption contexts. The research provides empirical evidence for a bias - here called pink bias - that leads male consumers to avoid consumption of pink-colored products because of a gender-related prejudice. An experimental study investigated the interplay of the consumption context (private/public) and product type (utilitarian/hedonic), and used heterosexual orientation as moderator. The findings confirmed the existence of a pink bias, according to which men tend to avoid consumption of pink-colored products, especially in public circumstances. In male consumers who feel less heterosexual, this effect could be driven by the fear that consuming pink-colored products in public contexts would expose their sexual orientation and align them with femininity. Moreover, pink-colored products could find success among heterosexual males only when they are exclusively for private use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available