3.8 Article

Barriers to Hepatitis C Virus Care and How Federally Qualified Health Centers Can Improve Patient Access to Treatment

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 343-352

Publisher

ELMER PRESS INC
DOI: 10.14740/gr1568

Keywords

Direct-acting antivirals; FQHC; Barriers; HCV provider

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to explore the impact of demographic-based and insurance-based barriers on HCV treatment access for the FQHC population. It found that insurance restrictions were the greatest challenge affecting treatment outcomes in the study population.
Background: Despite the availability of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, disparities in HCV care and treatment persist for underserved populations due to demo-graphic-based and insurance-based barriers. We aim to examine the effect of barriers on HCV treatment access for a federally qualified health center (FQHC) population.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated medical records of adults di-agnosed with chronic HCV at an FQHC clinic from 2016 to 2020 with follow-up through 2021. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to describe the patient population and significant associations between predictors of linkage to HCV care and treatment access. Ad-justed multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of starting HCV treatment.Results: Of 279 total patients with chronic HCV, 162 patients started treatment (58%), 138 patients (50%) completed treatment, and 99 pa-tients (35%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). Of the total patients, 145 (52%) were seen by their primary care physician (PCP) for their HCV care and treatment, and 134 (48%) were seen by a provider that specializes in management and treatment of HCV (HCV provider). Patients seen by an HCV provider in addition to their PCP were more likely to have had their prior authorization requests for HCV treatment denied by their insurance providers than patients seen only by their PCP for HCV care (30% vs. 14%, P = 0.001). We believe that this discrepancy stems from two issues. One, prior au-thorizations are reviewed by insurance providers who are not special-ly trained in HCV management, so the verbiage used perplexes these reviewers, possibly causing them to issue denials. Two, insurance providers often require HCV genotype testing for DAA medication eligibility, and HCV providers order genotype tests for patients only when HCV treatments have failed to cure patients, so this requirement becomes another barrier to DAA medications. Patients who spoke a non-English language, lived in the USA for less than 10 years, and showed inability to pay for treatment had received treatment despite these characteristics being common barriers to HCV treatment. On multivariate regression, factors independently associated with pa-tients starting treatment included prior denial for DAA medication (odds ratio (OR), 8.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.22 -24.6; P < 0.001) and being seen by an HCV provider (OR, 24.8; 95% CI, 11.7 -52.5; P < 0.001). However, the most significant barrier to HCV treatment access for the FQHC population was eligibility restrictions from insurance providers.Conclusions: Demographic-based barriers (e.g., age, race, and in-come) often impede HCV care and treatment, but insurance-based barriers are the greatest challenge currently that affects treatment out-comes in our study population. Removing these restrictions would, in our opinion, help to increase treatment levels to underserved popula-tions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available