3.8 Article

The relationship between visual display terminal usage at work and symptoms related to computer vision syndrome

Journal

Publisher

Korean Soc Occupational & Environmental Medicine
DOI: 10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e1

Keywords

Computer vision syndrome; Asthenopia; Headache; Cross-sectional studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the relationship between the usage of visual display terminal (VDT) and symptoms related to computer vision syndrome (CVS) in a large population including both white-collar and blue-collar workers. Results showed that the risk of headache/eyestrain and suspected CVS significantly increased in the group with the highest VDT usage at work. Regardless of occupational classification, the use of VDT in the workplace was found to increase the risk of headache/eyestrain, highlighting the importance of paying attention to the health of VDT workers and improving their working conditions.
Background: Although it is well known that the usage of visual display terminal (VDT) at the workplace causes computer vision syndrome (CVS), previous studies mainly focused on computer use and the health of white-collar workers. In this study, we explored the relationship between the usage of VDT including various devices, and symptoms related to CVS in a large population including pink-collar workers and blue-collar workers.Methods: 21,304 wage workers over the age of 20 years were analyzed from the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey. To investigate the association between VDT use at work and symptoms related to CVS among wage workers, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by multivariate logistic regression models.Results: In the group with the highest VDT usage at work, the OR of headache/eyestrain was 2.16 (95% CI: 1.86-2.52). The OR of suspected CVS patients was significantly increased in the highest group of usage of VDT at work (OR: 1.69; 95% CI, 1.39-2.06). Compare with the reference group, the OR for headache/eyestrain in the highest group of VDT usage was 2.81 (95% CI: 2.13-3.70) in white-collar workers, 1.78 (95% CI: 1.32-2.40) in pink-collar workers, and 1.59 (95% CI: 1.18-2.15) in blue-collar workers.Conclusions: We observed a relationship in which the use of VDT in the workplace increases the risk of headache/eyestrain regardless of occupational classification. Our findings emphasize the importance of paying attention to the health of VDT workers and making plans to improve their working conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available