3.8 Article

Computer vision syndrome in teachers of a university of the province of Lima

Journal

Publisher

INST ADVANCED SCIENCE EXTENSION
DOI: 10.21833/ijaas.2023.01.001

Keywords

Eye health; Teacher; Education; Eye diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Virtual education during the coronavirus pandemic has caused visual problems for people due to increased computer usage. This study focuses on determining the computer-related ophthalmic syndrome in teachers at a university in the province of Lima. The results show that 19% of teachers have computer vision syndrome. It is important to educate the population engaging in virtual education, including students, about the prevention measures and consequences of computer ophthalmic syndrome.
Virtual education has generated consequences at the visual level of people during the coronavirus pandemic since spending more time on the computer, it compromises the eye health of the person causing long-term visual problems, so its research objective is to determine the computer-related ophthalmic syndrome in teachers at a university of the province of Lima. It is a quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive, and cross-sectional study, with a total population of sixty-three teachers who answered a digital survey with socio-demographic data and the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q) instrument. In the results, we can observe the results of the computerized ophthalmic syndrome in teachers at a university in the province of Lima, where 51 (81%) of the teachers do not present computer vision syndrome, and 12 (19%) present computer vision syndrome. In conclusion, the population conducting virtual education should be educated as well as students about prevention measures for computer ophthalmic syndrome and its consequences.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by IASE. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available