Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning
Yechan Mun et al.
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2021)
Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Effectiveness Review
Timothy J. Wilt et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2021)
Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
Hyuna Sung et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2021)
Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study
Peter Strom et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2020)
Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study
Wouter Bulten et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2020)
High-accuracy prostate cancer pathology using deep learning
Yuri Tolkach et al.
NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE (2020)
Automated Gleason Grading and Gleason Pattern Region Segmentation Based on Deep Learning for Pathological Images of Prostate Cancer
Yuchun Li et al.
IEEE ACCESS (2020)
Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer
Kunal Nagpal et al.
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2019)
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options
Martin G. Sanda et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2018)
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options
Martin G. Sanda et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2018)
Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning
Ryan Poplin et al.
NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (2018)
Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning
Eirini Arvaniti et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2018)
PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING
Donald F. Gleason et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors
Abdelrazak Meliti et al.
PROSTATE (2017)
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Interobserver Reproducibility of Percent Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Prostate Biopsies
Evita T. Sadimin et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: An A la Carte'' Approach
Arjun Sivaraman et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer
Tayyar A. Ozkan et al.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: A performance comparison on a range of classifiers
Olivier Regnier-Coudert et al.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE (2012)