4.6 Article

Effect of supramaximal exercise training on metabolic outcomes in obese adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 35, Issue 20, Pages 1975-1981

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1243798

Keywords

Supramaximal exercise; aerobic indicators; lipid oxidation; obese adults

Categories

Funding

  1. Faculty of Superior Studies and Research of the Universite de Moncton

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of 6 weeks of supramaximal exercise training (SET) on performance variables and metabolic changes in sedentary obese adults.Twenty-four obese adults were randomly allocated into a non-trained (NT) [n=12; body mass index (BMI)=33(3)] and SET group [n=12; BMI=(33(2)]. After baseline metabolic and fitness measurements, the participants completed a 6-week SET intervention. Metabolic, anthropometric, and fitness assessments were repeated post-intervention.For SET, fasting glucose (4.64(0.15) vs. 4.32(0.22) mmol l(-1); P<0.01), insulin (23.2(4.6) vs. 13.8(3.3) mu mol ml(-1); P<0.01), homoeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index (4.78(1.2) vs. 2.65(1.5); P<0.01) and systolic blood pressure (127(3) vs. 120(3) mmHg; P<0.01) were significantly lower 24-h post-intervention than at baseline and for the NT group, and these changes remained significant at 72-h and 2-weeks post-intervention (P<0.01, respectively). Interestingly, nonesterified fatty acids (0.62(0.09) vs. 0.71(0.11) mmol l(-1); P<0.01) and resting fat oxidation rate (57(11) vs. 63(4)%; P<0.01) increased significantly from baseline 24-h post-intervention in the SET group and from baseline at 72-h (P<0.01, respectively) and 2-weeks post-intervention (P<0.01, respectively). Six weeks of SET improved a number of metabolic and vascular risk factors in obese, sedentary adults, highlighting the potential of SET to provide an alternative exercise model for the improvement of metabolic health in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available