4.2 Article

The influence of COVID-19 on modes of governance for climate change-Expert views from the Netherlands and the UK

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 351-363

Publisher

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/eet.2042

Keywords

climate policy; energy transition; governance; green recovery; pandemic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While the world is still struggling with the COVID-19 pandemic, countries are exploring ways to revive their economies. This presents a unique opportunity to reexamine the governance of climate change in a sustainable manner. Based on interviews with experts from government, industry, and third sector organizations in the UK and the Netherlands, it is clear that a more hierarchical approach is desired, with a combination of market and hierarchy seen as the best way forward.
While the world is still in the grasp of COVID-19, countries are contemplating how to get their economies back on their feet. With a unique opportunity to do so in a sustainable manner, there is an urgent need to revisit the governance of climate change. Opportunities are clearly there: the resurgence in top-down policies in the pandemic might spill-over to climate governance; green economic stimuli might cause an increase in market-based approaches; or an increased focus on solidarity, inclusion and collective buy-in may drive more inclusive network-based governance. Using the classic trichotomy of hierarchy, market and network governance, we have analysed the findings of 60 interviews with expert representatives from government, industry and third sector parties in the UK and the Netherlands. Their consideration of the key policies and measures needed to help the transition forward point towards a clear desire for a more hierarchical approach. In addition, mixing the three approaches, especially market and hierarchy, is considered the best way forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available