3.8 Article

The Impact of Gamification on Doctoral Students' Perceptions, Emotions, and Learning in an Online Environment

Journal

TECHTRENDS
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 706-717

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-022-00833-7

Keywords

Gamification; Gamified Learning; Emotion; Perception; Online Learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the perception and learning outcomes of gamification on doctoral students in an online environment. It explores the emotions experienced by students during the gamified learning experience, as well as the factors contributing to positive and negative emotions.
Despite the growing body of studies on gamification, there is a paucity of research investigating the specific emotional outcomes of gamified experiences. Most gamification studies have focused primarily on positive emotions such as enjoyment. In addition, most gamification studies in educational contexts have been conducted with undergraduate students. To address the gaps in the literature, the present study examined the impact of gamification on doctoral students' perceptions of gamification and their learning in an online environment. Further, it explored what kinds of emotions they felt before, during, and after the gamified learning experience and what factors contributed to their positive and negative emotions. The study was conducted in an online, doctoral-level course, which was offered at a public university in the United States. The game elements used in the course included challenges, points and extra points, unannounced badges, choices, team collaboration and competition, and voting. The results of the study shed light on various emotions experienced by doctoral students in the gamified learning context, major factors contributing to both positive and negative emotions, as well as the impact of gamification on their attitudes and learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available