4.4 Article

Motivation and Knowledge of Portuguese Community Pharmacists Towards the Reporting of Suspected Adverse Reactions to Medicines: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 295-308

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01168-3

Keywords

Adverse drug reaction reporting systems; Health knowledge; Attitudes; Practice; Pharmacist; Community Pharmacist; Pharmacovigilance; Drug monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The close contact between patients and community pharmacists in Portugal offers ideal conditions for detecting and reporting adverse drug reactions (ADR). This study evaluated the motivation and knowledge of ADR reporting by community pharmacists in Porto, Portugal, while also exploring alternative methods to the current reporting procedure. The results showed that regular notifiers were more familiar with the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System (PPS) and were more proactive in identifying and questioning patients about ADR. On the other hand, non-regular notifiers showed reluctance in being judged for their reporting activities. The study identified opportunities to improve ADR reporting, such as providing feedback from PPS, implementing training programs, and simplifying the reporting process by integrating it into pharmacy software.
The close contact between patients and community pharmacists, along with the extensive geographical distribution of pharmacies in Portugal, offer exceptional conditions to detect and report adverse drug reactions (ADR). This study aimed to evaluate the motivation and knowledge of spontaneous reporting of ADR by community pharmacists of Porto, Portugal. Secondly, we aimed to generate real-world evidence on the main factors determining ADR report and at raising potential alternatives to the current reporting procedure in community pharmacy. We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, anonymous web survey-based study. Between April and July 2021, a web survey was implemented, targeting community pharmacists in the Porto district, Portugal. We validated 217 surveys from pharmacists. Regular notifiers seem to be more familiarised than non-regular notifiers with the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System (PPS), with the Portal RAM for reporting suspected ADR, and with the update of the concept of ADR. Moreover, regular notifiers seem to be more proactive with their care in questioning patients about ADR and have more self-knowledge to identify suspected ADR. Conversely, non-regular notifiers, seem to be more reluctant to be judged by their ADR reporting activities. Respondents suggested to simplify and optimise the reporting process (31% of the suggestions), or to integrate a reporting platform into the pharmacy's software (27%). This study identified opportunities to promote the ADR reporting process by community pharmacists, namely receiving feedback from the PPS on the reported case and its regulatory implications, implementing training programs in pharmacovigilance, and creating solutions to simplify the reporting process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available