4.6 Article

Direct optical band gap measurement in polycrystalline semiconductors: A critical look at the Tauc method

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages 43-48

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2016.05.010

Keywords

Band gap; Diffuse-reflectance; Photoluminescence; ITO; Degenerate doping

Funding

  1. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-08ER46536]
  2. Air Products Foundation through the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Graduate Fellowship
  3. W. M. Keck Foundation
  4. Northwestern University
  5. NIH
  6. Rice Foundation
  7. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
  8. MRSEC program of the National Science Foundation [NSF-DMR-1121262]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The direct optical band gap of semiconductors is traditionally measured by extrapolating the linear region of the square of the absorption curve to the x-axis, and a variation of this method, developed by Tauc, has also been widely used. The application of the Tauc method to crystalline materials is rooted in misconception-and traditional linear extrapolation methods are inappropriate for use on degenerate semiconductors, where the occupation of conduction band energy states cannot be ignored. A new method is proposed for extracting a direct optical band gap from absorption spectra of degenerately doped bulk semiconductors. This method was applied to pseudo-absorption spectra of Sn-doped In2O3 (ITO) converted from diffuse-reflectance measurements on bulk specimens. The results of this analysis were corroborated by room-temperature photoluminescence excitation measurements, which yielded values of optical band gap and Burstein-Moss shift that are consistent with previous studies on In2O3 single crystals and thin films. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available