4.1 Article Data Paper

Whole genome sequencing data of Chromobacterium amazonense BASUSDA_45 isolated from soil in Bangladesh capable of degrading pesticide

Journal

DATA IN BRIEF
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108853

Keywords

WGS; Pesticide; Cypermethrin; Microbial genomics; Bioinformatics; Sequence assembly; Biodegradation; PGAP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents the draft genomic sequence of Chromobacterium amazonense BASUSDA_45 strain, which was isolated from cypermethrin pesticide contaminated soil. The sequencing process involved de novo assembly, trimming, and quality check, resulting in 125 contigs with an N50 of 78,923. Further mapping generated 53 scaffolds with a total length of 4,295,151 bp, a GC content of 62.30%, and an N50 of 3,726,017. Annotation using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) identified 4181 genes, including 4096 coding sequences, 76 tRNAs, 3 rRNAs, and 4 noncoding RNAs. The raw sequence reads and annotated genome have been deposited in NCBI's Bioproject repository under the accession number PRJNA686506.
This article reports the Chromobacterium amazonense BASUSDA_45 strain's draft genomic sequence. The bacterium was isolated from cypermethrin pesticide contaminated soil and then the sequencing was carried out. Initially de novo assembly of the raw sequences, trimming and quality check generates 125 contigs having N50 of 78,923. Further mapping of the contigs generated scaffolds. The genome contains 53 scaffolds with a total length of 4,295,151 bp having 62.30% GC content and N50 of 3,726,017. Annotation using Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) reveals 4181 genes among which 4096 were coding sequences, 76 tRNAs, 3 rRNAs, 4 noncoding RNAs. The raw sequence reads and annotated genome were uploaded to NCBI's Bioproject repository with the accession number PRJNA686506.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available