4.3 Article

A Kaupapa Maori conceptualization and efforts to address the needs of the growing precariat in Aotearoa New Zealand: A situated focus on Maori

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 39-55

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12598

Keywords

action research; assemblage; indigenous; Kaupapa Maori; precariat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the precariat in New Zealand, particularly the unique position of the Maori people within it. By incorporating Maori cultural values, psychology, and social science scholarship, it offers new conceptualizations of the Maori precariat. Furthermore, the article showcases how research findings can be utilized to inform policies addressing poverty reduction, welfare system reforms, and the promotion of decent work.
In Aotearoa New Zealand, the precariat is populated by at least one in six New Zealanders, with Maori (Indigenous peoples) being over-represented within this emerging social class. For Maori, this socio-economic positioning reflects a colonial legacy spanning 150 years of economic and cultural subjugation, and intergenerational experiences of material, cultural and psychological insecurities. Relating our Kaupapa Maori approach (Maori cultural values and principles underlining research initiatives) to the precariat, this article also draws insights from existing scholarship on social class in psychology and Assemblage Theory in the social sciences to extend present conceptualizations of the Maori precariat. In keeping with the praxis orientation central to our approach, we consider three exemplars of how our research into Maori precarity is mobilized in efforts to inform public deliberations and government policies regarding poverty reduction, humanizing the welfare system and promoting decent work. Note: Aotearoa New Zealand has been popularized within the everyday lexicon of New Zealanders as a political statement of Indigenous rights for Maori.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available