4.2 Article

Change Talk Subtypes as Predictors of Alcohol Use Following Brief Motivational Intervention

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/adb0000898

Keywords

alcohol use; targeted maximum likelihood estimation; variable importance; change language; motivational interviewing

Funding

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) [U24AA022003, R01AA009892, P01AA019072, K01 AA026335, K02AA027546, P30AI042853]
  2. National Institutes of Health - Center of Biomedical Research Excellence [P20GM130414]
  3. Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine the relative importance of client change language subtypes as predictors of alcohol use. The results showed that self-reported sustain talk during the change planning process was the most important predictor of drinks per week and heavy drinking days. Additionally, self-reported sustain talk during taking steps process was also an important predictor of drinks per week and heavy drinking days.
Objective: To examine the relative importance of client change language subtypes as predictors of alcohol use following motivational interviewing (MI). Method: Participants were 164 heavy drinkers (57.3% female, M-age = 28.5 years, 13.4% Hispanic/Latinx, 82.9% White) recruited during an emergency department visit who received MI for alcohol and human immunodeficiency virus/sexual risk in a randomized-controlled trial. MI sessions were coded with the motivational interviewing skill code (MISC) and the generalized behavioral intervention analysis system (GBIAS). Variable importance analyses used targeted maximum likelihood estimation to rank order change language subtypes defined by these systems as predictors of alcohol use over 9 months of follow-up. Results: Among GBIAS change language subtypes, higher sustain talk (ST) around change planning was ranked the most important predictor of drinks per week (b = -5.57, 95% CI [-8.11, -3.02]) and heavy drinking days (b = -2.07, 95% CI [-3.17, -0.98]); this talk reflected (a) rejection of alcohol abstinence as a desired change goal, (b) rejection of specific change strategies, or (c) discussion of anticipated challenges in changing drinking. Among MISC change language subtypes, higher ST around taking steps-reflecting recent escalations in drinking described by a small minority of participants-was ranked the most important predictor of drinks per week (b = 22.71, 95% CI [20.29, 25.13]) and heavy drinking days (b = -2.45, 95% CI [1.68, 3.21]). Conclusions: Results challenge the assumption that all ST during MI is a negative prognostic indicator and highlight the importance of the context in which change language emerges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available