Journal
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-023-09745-1
Keywords
Worked examples effect; Mathematics performance; Self-explanation; Geometry; Cognitive load theory; Mathematics learning; Incorrect examples
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This meta-analysis examines the average impact of worked examples on mathematics performance across different education stages and explores the influencing factors. After exclusions, a sample of high-quality experimental and quasi-experimental studies that reported on 181 effect sizes from 55 studies was included. The findings reveal that worked examples have a medium effect (g = 0.48, p = 0.01) on mathematics performance outcomes. Factors such as example type, pairing with self-explanation prompts, and timing of administration were found to moderate the effect.
The current meta-analysis quantifies the average effect of worked examples on mathematics performance from elementary grades to postsecondary settings and to assess what moderates this effect. Though thousands of worked examples studies have been conducted to date, a corresponding meta-analysis has yet to be published. Exclusionary coding was conducted on 8033 abstracts from published and grey literature to yield a sample of high quality experimental and quasi-experimental work. This search yielded 43 articles reporting on 55 studies and 181 effect sizes. Using robust variance estimation (RVE) to account for clustered effect sizes, the average effect size of worked examples on mathematics performance outcomes was medium with g = 0.48 and p = 0.01. Moderators assessed included example type (correct vs. incorrect examples alone or in combination with correct examples), pairing with self-explanation prompts, and timing of administration (i.e., practice vs. skill acquisition). The inclusion of self-explanation prompts significantly moderated the effect of examples yielding a negative effect in comparison to worked examples conditions that did not include self-explanation prompts. Worked examples studies that used correct examples alone yielded larger effect sizes than those that used incorrect examples alone or correct examples in combination with incorrect examples. The worked examples effect yields a medium effect on mathematics outcomes whether used for practice or initial skill acquisition. Correct examples are particularly beneficial for learning overall, and pairing examples with self-explanation prompts may not be a fruitful design modification. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available