4.6 Article

Forecasting in factor augmented regressions under structural change

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 62-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.12.004

Keywords

Factor augmented regression; Structural instability; Estimation window; Cross-sectional averages; Out-of-sample forecasts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Factor augmented regressions are widely used for out-of-sample forecasting, but neglecting structural instability can significantly impact forecasting performance. This study examines the effect of neglected structural instability on factor augmented regressions and finds that conditioning upon the most recent breaks leads to more accurate forecasts. However, the actual gain depends on the location and magnitude of the breaks.
Factor augmented regressions are widely used to produce out-of-sample forecasts of macroeconomic and financial time series. However, these series are subject to occasional breaks. We study the effect of neglected structural instability on the forecasts produced by factor augmented regressions when the latent factors are estimated by cross-sectional averages from a large panel of variables. Our results show that neglecting structural instability can be very costly in terms of forecasting performance. We derive analytical results to show that instability in the factor model and in the forecasting equation impacts the produced forecasts. We further provide numerical results showing that conditioning upon the most recent break tends to produce more accurate forecasts than unconditional estimation methods based on expanding or rolling windows. However, the actual gain depends on the location and the magnitude of the breaks. Finally, an application to out-of-sample stock return forecasting using liquidity proxies illustrates the empirical relevance of our results.(c) 2022 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available