Smallholders? livelihoods in the presence of commercial farms in central Kenya

We study smallholder households livelihood profiles in central Kenya in an area characterized by the presence of many large commercial farms. We surveyed 375 smallholder households, compared them according to three categories (employed, contract farmers, households non-engaged with commercial farms), and constructed a livelihood index. The results show that contract farmers and households employed on farms are only a small fraction of all smallholders. Employed and non-employed households show little difference in overall livelihood profiles. Results suggest that employment on large commercial farms is mainly a coping strategy for younger households or in times of need. Contract farmers were found only in a specific location and had better access to irrigation water and higher livestock holdings. Comparison with earlier data shows the persistence of precarious livelihood levels and household strategies aiming at diversification of activities, with little evolution over the last 20 years despite the presence of commercial farms. Overall, there is little evidence that the proximity to the commercial farms offers a way out of poverty for nearby smallholder farmers.

Automated summary

This study investigates the livelihood profiles of smallholder households in central Kenya, where there are a significant number of large commercial farms. The findings suggest that employment on these farms is mainly a coping strategy for younger households or in times of need. Contract farmers, who are located in specific areas, have better access to irrigation water and higher livestock holdings. Despite the presence of commercial farms, there is little evidence that proximity to these farms offers a way out of poverty for nearby smallholder farmers. The study also highlights the persistence of precarious livelihood levels and limited evolution over the past 20 years.