4.5 Article

Evaluation of cytotoxicity, loading, and release activity of paclitaxel loaded-porphyrin based metal-organic framework (PCN-600)

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12634

Keywords

PCN-600; Drug delivery; Paclitaxel; Anticancer drugs; Metal-organic frameworks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the side effects and lack of drug release control in conventional therapeutic treatments, there is a need for novel biocompatible carriers. In this study, an iron-based organic metal framework (PCN-600) was synthesized as a drug delivery system. The PCN-600 crystals had a hexagonal-rod morphology with dimensions of 300 nm in length and 100-300 nm in width. The anticancer drug Paclitaxel (PTX) was successfully loaded into PCN-600 with a loading efficiency of 87.3%. PTX-encapsulated PCN-600 exhibited controlled and sustained release for up to 24 hours at pH = 7.4.
Considering the inducement side impacts and precipitation of continual doses in conventional therapeutic treatments, there is an urgent need in the field of drug delivery for novel designs of biocompatible carriers with wide loading dimensions and particularly the ability to control their drug release. In this work, we succeeded in synthesizing an iron-based organic metal framework based on iron-porphyrin (PCN-600) through a solvothermal method to function as a drug delivery system (DDS). According to SEM results, PCN-600 crystals a hexagonal-rod shaped morphology with the length of 300 nm and width of 100-300 nm. As an anticancer drug, Paclitaxel (PTX) was successfully loaded into the porphyrin-based metal-organic framework (PCN-600) via in-situ encapsulation; the loading efficiency was measured to be about 87.3%. In addition, PTXencapsulated PCN-600 displayed a controlled and sustained release for up to 24 h of release assessment at the physiological microenvironment of pH = 7.4.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available