4.5 Article

Stability of vitamin A, E, C and thiamine during storage of different powdered enteral formulas

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11460

Keywords

Enteral formulas; Vitamin A; Vitamin E; Vitamin C; Thiamine; Stability

Funding

  1. National Key R & D Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [2021YFD2100100]
  4. [32171836]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the changes in vitamin A, E, C, and thiamine in two different commercial enteral formulas during different storage conditions. The results showed that the content of vitamin A, E, and thiamine decreased with an increase in temperature or time, while the level of vitamin C remained stable. The vitamins exhibited more stability at a storage temperature of 25℃, relative humidity of 60%. The degradation of vitamins A, E, and thiamine during storage followed first order kinetic equations.
In this study, two different kinds of commercial enteral formulas were selected to evaluate the changes of vitamin A, E, C and thiamine during the different storage conditions of different temperature and relative humidity (60 +/- 1 degrees C, 60 +/- 5% for 5 and 10 days; 37 +/- 1 degrees C, 75 +/- 5% for 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 months; 25 +/- 1 degrees C, 60 +/- 5% for 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months). The results showed that as the temperature or time increased, the content of vitamin A, E and thiamine was gradually decreased whilst the level of vitamin C remained stable. The vitamins exhibited more stability at the storage of 25 +/- 1 degrees C, RH 60 +/- 5%. Vitamin A and thiamine decreased more in the polymeric formula (EFA) than that in the oligomeric formula (EFB), while, vitamin E decreased less in EFA than that in EFB. The kinetics of vitamin A, E and thiamine degradation during storage followed first order kinetic equations. Furthermore, the final levels of vitamins were higher than the minimum level recommended by legislation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available