4.2 Article

Epidemiology of hyperadrenocorticism among 210,824 dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in the UK from 2009 to 2014

Journal

JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE
Volume 57, Issue 7, Pages 365-373

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12523

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Kennel Club
  2. Kennel Club Charitable Trust
  3. Dogs Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVESTo estimate prevalence and risk factors for diagnosis with hyperadrenocorticism in dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in the UK from 2009 to 2014. METHODSCases were identified by searching the de-identified electronic patient records from UK primary-care veterinary practices participating in the VetCompass Programme. RESULTSThe estimated prevalence for hyperadrenocorticism diagnosis in dogs was 028% (95% confidence interval: 025 to 031). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed four associated risk factors: breed, breed-relative bodyweight, age and insurance status. The bichon frise had 65 times the odds (95% CI: 35 to 121, P<0001) of hyperadrenocorticism compared with crossbreds. Dogs weighing more than or equal to their breed mean had 17 times the odds (95% CI: 13 to 23, P<0001) of hyperadrenocorticism compared with dogs weighing less than the breed mean. Dogs aged 120 years and above showed 57 times the odds (95% CI: 37 to 87, P<0001) of hyperadrenocorticism compared with dogs aged 60 to 89 years. Insured dogs had 40 times the odds (95% CI: 28 to 56, P<0001) of hyperadrenocorticism compared with non-insured dogs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEThis is the first epidemiological report of a non-referral hospital population of dogs diagnosed with hyperadrenocorticism in the UK and describes important breed, age and bodyweight associations with this disorder which may improve diagnosis and enhance understanding of the underlying pathophysiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available