4.7 Article

Why are exporters more gender-friendly? Evidence from China

Journal

ECONOMIC MODELLING
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106087

Keywords

Matched employer-employee data; Firm export; Female employment; Gender gap

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the link between firm export activity and female employment share in China and finds that exporters tend to have a larger share of female employees and a smaller gender earnings gap compared to non-exporters. The analysis suggests that this gender-friendlier behavior is driven by cost-competitive motivations rather than international laws or exploiting gender comparative advantages. Additionally, the study shows that the production profession, non-SOEs, and firms with lower management efficiency in China are more sensitive to market competition.
Although export orientation has been found in some studies to enlarge the female employment share in firms, the explanatory channels have received limited empirical attention. This paper seeks to fill this gap by studying the link between firm export activity and female employment share using matched employer-employee data from China. We find that the female employment share tends to be larger, and the gender earnings gap tends to be smaller in exporters than in non-exporters after controlling for the characteristics of both the employees and their employers. The channel analysis reveals that exporters' gender-friendlier behaviors are more likely to be driven by cost-competitive motivations rather than by international laws or the exploitation of gender comparative advantages. Further analysis shows that the production profession, non-SOEs, and firms with lower management efficiency in China tend to be more sensitive to market competition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available