4.3 Review

The Prevalence of HIV Infection in Minority Indigenous Populations of the South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 2226-2242

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-022-03954-5

Keywords

HIV-AIDS; Indigenous population; South-East Asia; Western Pacific; Systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence of HIV infection in minority indigenous populations in the SEAR and WPR regions. The study found a high prevalence of HIV in high-risk subpopulations and a lack of data for many countries, with China contributing the majority of comparative studies. The study also showed a significant difference in HIV prevalence between minority indigenous populations and other populations in the WPR region.
A random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of HIV infection within minority indigenous populations of the South-East Asia (SEAR) and Western Pacific Regions (WPR). Sub-group analyses were conducted, and the sources of heterogeneity explored through meta-regression. The majority of studies were undertaken in high HIV risk subpopulations. There was a paucity of data for many countries with data from China representing 70% of the comparative studies. Within minority indigenous populations the pooled prevalence of HIV infection was 13.7% (95% CI 8.9, 19) and 8.4% (95% CI 6.3, 10.7) among other populations. The prevalence differential between populations was significant in the WPR (adjusted odds ratio 1.1, 95% CI 1.0, 1.2). Across both regions, in contrast to other populations, minority indigenous did not experience any significant reduction in HIV prevalence over the years of data collection. There was large heterogeneity in the prevalence of HIV across studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available