4.7 Article

Impacts of urban living lab (ULL) on learning to design inclusive, sustainable, and climate-resilient urban environments

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106443

Keywords

Urban living lab; Inclusivity; Sustainable urban design; Creating partnerships

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban design education research recognizes the importance of partnerships and collaborations with stakeholders to support holistic planning, governance, design, and decision-making processes. The design of inclusive and sustainable urban environments is challenging due to varying meanings in different cities. This study examines the role of the urban living lab (ULL) methodology in designing inclusive, sustainable, and climate-resilient urban environments. The ULL approach facilitates critical awareness and links between research, experience, and land use policy practice.
Urban design education research increasingly acknowledges the crucial need to create partnerships and collaborations with relevant stakeholders to support urban environments' planning, governance, design, and decision-making processes in the most holistic manner. However, an inclusive and sustainable urban environment does not have the same meaning for every city, making its design more challenging. The sensory spatial qualities of cities are complex and depend on many social, economic, political, cultural, and natural factors. Thus, this study explores the role of the urban living lab (ULL) methodology in designing inclusive, sustainable, and climate-resilient urban environments in a graduate design studio course. In this study, the ULL was more than a lab. It opened up the critical awareness of multiple links between research, experience, and practice in land use policy. This ULL pedagogical approach could be replicated in different urban contexts to support the decision and design phase of the land use policy process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available