4.7 Article

Social acceptance of NIMBY facilities: A comparative study between public acceptance and the social license to operate analytical frameworks

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106453

Keywords

Social acceptance; Not-In-My-Backyard facilities; Public Acceptance Framework; Social License to Operate Framework; Comparative study; China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NIMBY facilities play a significant role in the sustainable development of countries, and their successful introduction and operation are increasingly influenced by local communities. Two mainstream research approaches, public acceptance (PA) and social license to operate (SLO), have been proposed to enhance this. This study introduces the emerging SLO framework and discusses its applicability to NIMBY facilities in China based on a questionnaire survey. The findings enrich the existing literature on social acceptance assessment and management of industry-community relationships in the provision of NIMBY facilities.
Not-In-My-Backyard (NIMBY) facilities play a significant role globally in the sustainable and healthy develop-ment of countries, and their successful introduction and operation has become increasingly critically influenced by local communities. Two mainstream research approaches have been proposed to enhance this, in the form of a public acceptance (PA) framework and a social license to operate (SLO) framework. However, the outcomes of social acceptance within the two approaches in typical NIMBY facilities in China have not been examined empirically. In response, this study introduces the emerging SLO framework, and discusses its applicability to the NIMBY facilities by a comparative analysis with PA, based on a questionnaire survey of residents (with a final sample size of 94) adjacent to a typical waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration plant located in Zhejiang province, China. The results show that, firstly, social acceptance assessed under the two frameworks is similar. Second, the community acceptance of Jiufeng case measured by SLO is non-linear and multi-dimensional, and there is a lack of institutional trust. Third, the viability of SLO is constrained by its social vulnerability and may occur through collective protests. These findings theoretically enrich the existing literature concerning social acceptance assessment and management of the dynamic industry-community relationships involved in the provision of NIMBY facilities. The findings will also be of practical value for government agencies and industrial sectors in gaining the social license needed from local communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available