4.7 Article

Fossil resource market power and capital markets

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106445

Keywords

Market power; Fossil resources; capital market; General equilibrium; Sovereign wealth funds

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores how a resource-rich country determines its extraction strategy by considering its influence on the capital market. The findings suggest that the supply of resources has a significant impact on capital returns and affects the extraction decisions of resource monopolists. The general-equilibrium feedback and capital asset holdings alter the monopolist's extraction strategy and are relevant for future technological changes.
Supplying a crucial exhaustible resource to the world market induces profound repercussions in the capital markets. Employing a two-country model with international trade, we examine how a resource-rich country with monopolistic market power accounts for this interplay with the capital market in its extraction decision over time. We investigate new supply motives resulting from the general-equilibrium feedbacks and from capital asset holdings of the resource-rich country. Recognizing the influence of resource supply on capital returns can lead the resource monopolist to accelerate or postpone extraction while the influence on capital accumulation poses an incentive to accelerate extraction and to exploit the importers' increased future resource dependence. Overall, in the reference calibration, the conventional conservationist bias of resource market power is reversed. The general-equilibrium supply motives substantially alter the resource monopolist's reaction to more competitive capital-intensive resource substitutes, demonstrating the relevance of our observations for future technological change. Similarly, these supply motives may reverse the effects of a future tax on the exporting countries' asset holdings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available