4.7 Article

Scrutinizing commodity markets by quantile spillovers: A case study of the Australian economy

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106482

Keywords

Commodity markets; Diebold and Yilmaz connectedness; Quantile spillovers; Australia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite Australia's leading role in exporting strategic commodities, little research has been done on the effects of these exports on stock and currency markets in Australia. This study aims to investigate the volatility connectedness among various commodities and markets, using a combination of different methodologies. The findings suggest that mean-based measures do not accurately capture the effects of spillovers, and certain commodities and assets play a more significant role as shock transmitters. The study provides important insights for market participants in managing price volatility shocks and related risks, particularly during extreme market conditions.
Notwithstanding Australia plays the lead role in exporting strategic commodities such as crude oil, natural gas, coal, Liquid Natural Gas (LNG), and iron ore, a scattering of researchers attempts to investigate the effects of exported commodities on stock and currency in Australia. In this academic research, our objective is to delve deeply into volatility connectedness among Brent oil, natural gas, coal, iron ore, LNG, stock, and currency markets in Australia. To that end, we adopt Ando et al. (2018) and Barunik and Krehlik (2018) techniques which are built upon Diebold and Yilmaz's (2012) framework for utilizing quantile- and frequency-based spillover analysis respectively. Finally, we used a recent approach developed by Chatziantoniou et al. (2022) for robustness purposes which combines quantile-spillover (due to Ando et al., 2018) and frequency-spillover (due to Barunik and Krehlik, 2018). This approach enables us not only to overcome the methodological shortcomings of prior studies but also to provide an insightful analysis regarding interrelationships across pivotal commodities. Our findings reveal that lower and upper quantiles show more satisfactory performance compared to the conditional mean. This implies that the usage of mean-based connectedness measures does not provide accurate results. More precisely, even though it provides a practical framework for gauging extreme spillovers, it overlooks certain quantiles. The framework, accordingly, undervalues the real effects of spillovers across the markets. What is more, the mentioned principal approach deploys Ordinary Least Square (OLS) framework to gauge the VAR. As a dire consequence, this framework prevents improving the efficiency of the model. We discern Brent oil, natural gas, and Australian stock are the most consequential net transmitters of shocks in this system. Plus, the total spillover index reveals a high level of strength in the return spillovers amid the assets. In terms of policy implications, we expect our outcomes to aid market participants in expanding their perceptions concerning price volatility shocks in these crucial markets. For investors, they are able to measure related risks during extreme positive or extreme negative conditions, leading investors to stabilize their portfolios during extreme conditions and hedging, and risk-pricing, at that. From the results of BK (2018), we comprehend total connectedness does not properly perform in long-horizon. This suggests investors should not hold the markets in short-horizon by reason of high volatility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available