4.6 Article

Chimpanzee and Human Risk Preferences Show Key Similarities

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 358-369

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/09567976221140326

Keywords

decision making; chimpanzees; risk preference; risk taking; ambiguity aversion; life span; life-history theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Risk preference plays a significant role in people's decisions regarding health, wealth, and well-being. In this study, chimpanzees exhibited risk-taking behavior that shared similarities with humans, suggesting that key dimensions of risk preference may emerge independently of human cultural evolution. Chimpanzees showed consistency in their risk preferences across domains and measurements, displayed ambiguity aversion, and males were more prone to risk-taking than females. Furthermore, risk-taking behavior peaked in young adulthood.
Risk preference impacts how people make key life decisions related to health, wealth, and well-being. Systematic variations in risk-taking behavior can be the result of differences in fitness expectations, as predicted by life-history theory. Yet the evolutionary roots of human risk-taking behavior remain poorly understood. Here, we studied risk preferences of chimpanzees (86 Pan troglodytes; 47 females; age = 2-40 years) using a multimethod approach that combined observer ratings with behavioral choice experiments. We found that chimpanzees' willingness to take risks shared structural similarities with that of humans. First, chimpanzees' risk preference manifested as a traitlike preference that was consistent across domains and measurements. Second, chimpanzees were ambiguity averse. Third, males were more risk prone than females. Fourth, the appetite for risk showed an inverted-U-shaped relation to age and peaked in young adulthood. Our findings suggest that key dimensions of risk preference appear to emerge independently of the influence of human cultural evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available