4.7 Article

Presentation of celebrities' private life through visual social media

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113524

Keywords

Celebrity; Social Media; Popularity; Parasocial Relationships; Athletes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many celebrities have started to share seemingly private moments and focus not only on themselves but also on friends and family. This study investigates how sharing private moments affects their popularity in influencer marketing. Analyzing visual and textual data from 1,437 celebrities with over 350,000 Instagram posts, the study finds an inverted U-shape relationship between sharing private content and social media popularity. Additionally, self-presentation with a high degree of self-focus helps celebrities grow in popularity.
Alongside the impressions they make from their professional careers, many celebrities have started to present themselves in seemingly private moments and create content that not only focuses on themselves but also on friends and family members. Against this background, we investigated how celebrities sharing their private moments affects their popularity, a key metric in influencer marketing. We analyzed both visual and textual data from a sample of 1,437 celebrities with more than 350,000 posts on Instagram. The results showed an inverted U -shape relationship between sharing private (vs professional) content and social media popularity, with celebrities sharing less private content than would be optimal on average. A subsequent experiment confirmed this finding. While most celebrities increasingly share their professional content over the course of their career, we show that this may indeed have a negative effect on popularity. Furthermore, self-presentation with a high degree of self -focus helps celebrities to grow popularity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available