4.7 Article

Understanding change in disruptive contexts: The role of the time paradox and locus of control

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113491

Keywords

Change; Time; Locus of control; Extreme event; Disruptive context; COVID-19

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines how the experience of time and locus of control influence organizational change in disruptive contexts. Through analyzing qualitative data from five organizations in Turkey, researchers found that organizations approached change similarly in the short term but differently in the long term. The study reveals that the change process creates time pressure in disruptive contexts, and individuals' response to organizational change depends on their locus of control. The authors propose a framework to enhance organizational resilience to future disruptions.
We examine how the experience of time and locus of control influence organizational change in disruptive contexts. Through the cycles of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and their relaxations in Turkey, we found that organizations approached change similarly in the short term but differently in the long term. To unpack the mechanism behind these observations, we analyzed in-depth qualitative data from five organizations from March 2020 to September 2021. We reveal that the change process creates time pressure in disruptive contexts, and a time paradox emerges to the extent that the change outcomes increase the available time under time pressure. Depending on their locus of control, individuals either complement organizational change or resist it even more after triggering events that signal the lastingness of the post-disruption situation. Our framework may enhance organizational resilience to future disruptions by highlighting the requirement for change recipients to make complementary moves to regain control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available