4.3 Article

Does scapular morphology affect the integrity of the rotator cuff?

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 413-421

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.016

Keywords

Scapular morphology; acromion; rotator cuff; degenerative tear; acromion spur; acromion index; critical shoulder angle; acromion shape

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Current evidence suggests that distinct scapular morphologies may predispose patients to a rotator cuff tear. The objective of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the relationship between symptomatic degenerative cuff tears and different radiographic acromial characteristics, including acromion shape, indices (acromial index [AI], critical shoulder angle [CSA]), and acromial spur. Methods: We divided 166 patients into 3 groups matched for age and sex: group 1, degenerative full-thickness tear; group 2, partial thickness bursal tear; and group 3, normal cuff. Patients were evaluated with standard radiographs and ultrasonography. Results: The presence of an acromial spur was strongly associated with a full-thickness cuff tear (odds ratio, 3.5; P =.001). AI and CSA revealed a statistically significant difference between means of group 1 (P =.006) and group 3 (P <.001). There was no statistically significant difference in means of AI between groups 1 and 2 (P =.695) and between groups 2 and 3, with respect to AI (P =.071) and CSA (P =.125). Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed a higher area for CSA (0.70) than for AI (0.61). Stepwise logistic regression rejected AI as a cuff tear predictor but confirmed CSA and a spur to be stronger predictors of a full-thickness cuff tear. There was no association between the Bigliani acromial type and rotator cuff tear (P =.06). Conclusions: The presence of an acromion spur is strongly associated with full-thickness cuff tear. Higher AI and CSA are associated with a full-thickness tear but not with partial tears. The type of acromion is not related to cuff tear. (C) 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available