Horticultural activities can achieve the same affect improvement effect of green exercise: A randomized field controlled trial

Objectives: With the deepening of non-drug intervention research on human mental health, more and more attention has been paid to the benefits of horticultural activities and green exercise on physical and psychological health. This study compared the affect improvement between horticultural activities with the same intensity and green exercise and that with or without green plants to verify the value of horticultural activities and green exercise in improving human affect and the importance of green plants. Methods: A total of 160 subjects aged 18-26years (average age 22.5years) were recruited and randomly divided into a control group, a horticultural activity group with green plants, a horticultural activity group without green plants, and a green exercise group. Demographics, sociological variables, and daily physical activity levels were investigated. Green space at Zhejiang Normal University was selected as the test site. After finishing the preparation work, the subjects sat quietly for 8min before the pre-test. The horticultural group completed 20min of horticultural activities {8min of digging [40%*HRR(heart rate reserve)+RHR(resting heart rate)]+8min of transplantation [(50%*HRR+RHR)+4min of watering (30%*HRR+RHR)]}. The group returned to a calm state (no less than 20min) for the post-test. The green exercise group completed a 20-min power bike ride. The activity intensity and activity time of the green exercise group were determined according to the activity intensity and time of the horticultural group. Dependent variables were collected, including blood pressure, positive/negative affects, heart rate variability (RMSSD, SDNN, and LF/HF), and controlled covariate environmental parameters (field temperature, humidity, and noise). Results: (1) A significant difference was observed in the improvement effect except for negative affect between the green horticultural activity group and the green exercise group (F=3.310; eta p(2)=0.046; p=0.037). No significant difference was observed in other affect indicators. (2) In the same pattern of with and without green plant horticultural activity group, the green plant horticultural activity group had a better effect on the improvement of affect, and the two groups had a better negative affect (F=3.310; eta p(2) = 0.046; p=0.037), SDNN index of heart rate variability(F=1.035; eta p(2)=0.015; p=0.039), and RMSSD index (F=2.225; eta p(2)=0.032; p=0.014), and no significant difference was observed in the improvement effect of other affect indicators between the two groups. Conclusions: Having green horticulture can give the same intensity as green exercise and affect improvement. Findings suggest that people can choose green exercise or horticultural activities according to their preferences and physical characteristics in the two physical activities. Under the same pattern of horticultural activities, green plants are the key factor in improving the affect of horticultural activities. Choosing suitable plant types in horticultural activities is positively significant in enhancing affect.

Automated summary

This study compares the affect improvement between horticultural activities and green exercise and verifies the value of horticultural activities and green exercise in improving human affect and the importance of green plants. The results showed that having green horticulture can give the same intensity as green exercise and affect improvement. Green plants are the key factor in improving the affect of horticultural activities. People can choose between green exercise or horticultural activities based on their preferences and physical characteristics.