4.7 Review

Communication in fragile X syndrome: Patterns and implications for assessment and intervention

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929379

Keywords

fragile X syndrome; language; communication; intellectual disability; assessment; intervention

Funding

  1. Rush University, College of Health Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fragile X syndrome is a common cause of inherited intellectual disability and is often associated with a high rate of autism. Language delays are observed in various areas, including overall communication, receptive and expressive language, pragmatic language, speech sounds, and literacy. Individuals diagnosed with both fragile X syndrome and autism tend to have more significant intellectual disability and language disorder. This study explores the language phenotype of fragile X syndrome and highlights the roles of cognition, autistic symptomatology, and gender. Implications for assessment and intervention approaches based on the strengths and weaknesses of the fragile X syndrome language phenotype are discussed.
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common cause of inherited intellectual disability and is associated with a high rate of autism diagnosis. Language delays have been noted in the areas of overall communication and the specific areas of receptive, expressive, and pragmatic language, as well as in development of speech sounds and literacy. It has been widely noted that those individuals with a diagnosis of both FXS and autism tend to have more significant intellectual disability and language disorder. In this study, the research exploring the FXS language phenotype is presented, and the roles of cognition, autistic symptomatology, and gender are highlighted as possible. Implications for assessment and intervention approaches based on the strengths and weaknesses of the FXS language phenotype are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available