4.3 Article

SECEC Research Grant 2008 II: Use of platelet- and leucocyte-rich fibrin (L-PRF) does not affect late rotator cuff tendon healing: a prospective randomized controlled study

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 2-11

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.018

Keywords

Shoulder arthroscopy; rotator cuff; leucocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF); platelet-rich concentrates

Funding

  1. European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow
  2. Societe Europeenne pour la Chirurgie de l'Epaule et du Coude (SECEC) Research Grant
  3. Swiss Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Because the retear rate after rotator cuff repairs remains high, methods to improve healing are very much needed. Platelet-rich concentrates have been shown to enhance tenocyte proliferation and promote extracellular matrix synthesis in vitro; however, their clinical benefit remains unclear. We hypothesized that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with leucocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) results in better clinical and radiographic outcome at 12 months of follow-up than without L-PRF. Methods: Thirty-five patients were randomized to receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with L-PRF locally applied to the repair site (L-PRF_group, n = 17) or without L-PRF (L-PRF+ group, n = 18). Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation included the Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog score for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant-Murley score. The anatomic watertight healing, tendon thickness, and tendon quality was evaluated using magnetic resonance arthrography at 12 months of follow-up. Results: No complications were reported in either group. The mean Subjective Shoulder Value, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant-Murley scores increased from preoperatively to postoperatively, showing no significant differences between the groups. Complete anatomic watertight healing was found in 11 of 17 in the L-PRF+ group and in 11 of 18 in the L-PRP+ group (P = .73). The mean postoperative defect size (214 +/- 130 mm(2) in the L-PRF+ group vs 161 +/- 149 mm(2) in the L-PRF+ group; P = .391) and the mean postoperative tendon quality according to Sugaya (L-PRF+ group: 3.0 +/- 1.4, L-PRF+ group: 3.0 +/- 0.9) were similar in both groups at 12 months of follow-up. Conclusion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with application of L-PRF yields no beneficial effect in clinical outcome, anatomic healing rate, mean postoperative defect size, and tendon quality at 12 months of follow-up. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available