4.1 Article

EFFECTS OF AUTOTOMY COMPARED TO MANUAL DECLAWING ON CONTESTS BETWEEN MALES FOR FEMALES IN THE EDIBLE CRAB CANCER PAGURUS: IMPLICATIONS FOR FISHERY PRACTICE AND ANIMAL WELFARE

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 1037-1044

Publisher

NATL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2983/035.035.0426

Keywords

autotomy; Cancer pagurus; manual declawing; contests; welfare

Funding

  1. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Northern Ireland (DARDNI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many decapod fisheries, claws are removed and the animal is returned to the sea with the assumption that there is little impact on the fitness and welfare of the animal, or on the productivity of the population. Here, the impact of claw loss, by two methods of claw removal, is examined during competition between males for access to females in the crab Cancer pagurus. Males induced to autotomize a claw showed little reduction in their competitive ability; however, those subject to the fishery practice of manual declawing showed a marked decrease in their competitive ability. Compared with autotomized males, these declawed crabs displayed activities that suggest an awareness of the wound caused by the appendage being twisted off and the data are consistent with an impaired welfare for these animals. They were also less likely to display to their opponent compared with autotomized crabs. Intact males showed high aggression toward declawed males, which showed low aggression in return. Further, declawed crabs showed particularly high levels of submissive acts. The declawed crabs thus rarely gained the female compared with autotomized crabs. The present study demonstrates that manual declawing has a major detrimental impact on fitness and welfare of edible crabs and we suggest that this method of harvesting should be replaced with induced autotomy of a single claw.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available