4.7 Article

A novel cement-based auxetic foam composite: Experimental study

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01159

Keywords

Auxetic; Cement composite; Foam material; Auxetic foam; Mechanical metamaterial; Negative Poisson ?s ratio

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978330, 51808286]
  2. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province [BK20180710]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel cement-based auxetic foam composite is designed, fabricated and experimentally investigated. The influence of foam hole density, mass fraction and age on the flexural and compressive strength of the composite is analyzed. The results show that the incorporation of auxetic foam improves the strength and toughness of the composite.
Auxetic foam materials contract (expand) laterally under uniaxial compressive (tensile) load. Due to superior characteristics of auxetic foam, e.g., shear resistance and in-plane indentation resistance, studies of auxetic foam composites have been increasing in recent years. In this paper, a novel cement-based auxetic foam composite is designed, fabricated and experimentally investigated. The influence of foam hole density, mass fraction and age on the flexural and compressive strength of the composite is analyzed. The failure modes and crack development of the specimen are examined. It is found that the flexural and compressive strength of composite are improved at the curing age of 7 and 14 days, and reduced at the curing age of 28 days with the incorporation of auxetic foam. And the flexural compression ratio of the composite is greater than that of matrix material. The integrity of the specimen is preserved during the compression failure process of cement-based auxetic foam composites. It is indicated that the incorporation of auxetic foam improves the toughness and deformation behavior of composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available