4.7 Article

Using autoclave pulverization technology to evaluate the expansion potentiality of electric arc furnace oxidizing slag

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01901

Keywords

Electric arc furnace oxidizing slag; Steel slag; F-CaO; F-Mg0; Expansion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, four types of electric arc furnace oxidizing slag (EOS) were examined to analyze the relationship between the composition of EOS and its expansibility. A pressure vessel pulverization rate test technique was developed to evaluate the expansibility of EOS. The agglomeration phenomenon and particle size were found to affect the pulverization rate, and the optimal autoclave temperature and pressure for testing were determined.
In this study, four different sources of electric arc furnace oxidizing slag (EOS) were selected. The relationship between the composition of EOS and its expansibility was analyzed, and an autoclave pulverization rate test technique was developed to evaluate the expansibility of EOS. When the MgO/(FeO+MnO) in EOS is < 1 and the content of f-CaO does not exceed 0.40%, this can be used as the threshold for the lack of expansibility of EOS. The agglomeration phenomenon of particles is the factor affecting the autoclave pulverization rate test. For EOS with a particle size of #30-#100, the most obvious agglomeration phenomenon was produced in the autoclave environment, and its pulverization rate was greatly reduced. When the particle size of EOS was increased to #8-#30, the agglomeration phenomenon improved. When the particle size was increased to #4-#8, no obvious agglomeration problem was found. Thus, taking #4-#8 as the sample size of the autoclave pulverization rate test, after 3 h in the environment of 2.0 +/- 0.07 MPa (a corresponding temperature of 216 +/- 2 degrees C), the pulverization rate did not exceed 1.7%, and the EOS was judged to have no expansibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available