4.7 Article

AI in the hands of imperfect users

Journal

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00737-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes for Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  2. National Institutes for Mental Health
  3. European Union
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) of the National Institutes of Health
  5. Rock Ethics Institute at Penn State University
  6. [1R01TR004243-01]
  7. [3R01MH125958-02S1]
  8. [101057321]
  9. [101057099]
  10. [3R01EB027650-03S1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While bias in algorithms has received much attention, there is a need to address potential biases among human users of AI/ML and factors that influence user reliance. This article argues for a systematic approach to identifying user biases and calls for the development of interface design features informed by decision science and behavioral economics to promote critical decision-making using AI/ML.
As the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) continues to expand in healthcare, much attention has been given to mitigating bias in algorithms to ensure they are employed fairly and transparently. Less attention has fallen to addressing potential bias among AI/ML's human users or factors that influence user reliance. We argue for a systematic approach to identifying the existence and impacts of user biases while using AI/ML tools and call for the development of embedded interface design features, drawing on insights from decision science and behavioral economics, to nudge users towards more critical and reflective decision making using AI/ML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available