4.3 Article

Cell-level systems biology model to study inflammatory bowel diseases and their treatment options

Journal

CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 690-705

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12932

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systems biology model of the intestinal immune system was developed to understand IBD and its treatment modalities. The model characterized patients based on phenotype rather than assumptions, allowing for replication of IBD predispositions. Analysis of different treatment effects provided insights into individual drug therapy characteristics.
To help understand the complex and therapeutically challenging inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), we developed a systems biology model of the intestinal immune system that is able to describe main aspects of IBD and different treatment modalities thereof. The model, including key cell types and processes of the mucosal immune response, compiles a large amount of isolated experimental findings from literature into a larger context and allows for simulations of different inflammation scenarios based on the underlying data and assumptions. In the context of a large and diverse virtual IBD population, we characterized the patients based on their phenotype (in contrast to healthy individuals, they developed persistent inflammation after a trigger event) rather than on a priori assumptions on parameter differences to a healthy individual. This allowed to reproduce the enormous diversity of predispositions known to lead to IBD. Analyzing different treatment effects, the model provides insight into characteristics of individual drug therapy. We illustrate for anti-TNF-alpha therapy, how the model can be used (i) to decide for alternative treatments with best prospects in the case of nonresponse, and (ii) to identify promising combination therapies with other available treatment options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available