4.4 Article

Comparison of oblique and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: An updated meta-analysis

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Clinical Neurology

Comparing the medium-term outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion via transforaminal and oblique approach in treating lumbar degenerative disc diseases

Long Zhao et al.

Summary: By comparing the medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of TLIF and OLIF-AF in treating patients with LDDs, it was found that OLIF-AF has advantages in postoperative recovery, improvement of spinal lordosis and intervertebral fusion, but is slightly inferior in spinal canal decompression efficacy compared to TLIF.

SPINE JOURNAL (2022)

Review Biology

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Min Cheol Chang et al.

Summary: This systematic review compared oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. The study found no significant difference in clinical and radiological outcomes between OLIF and TLIF, but OLIF had shorter hospital stays and less blood loss. The results were based on low-quality evidence from a small number of retrospective studies.

LIFE-BASEL (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Single-level controlled comparison of OLIF51 and percutaneous screw in lateral position versus MIS-TLIF for lumbosacral degenerative disorders: Clinical and radiologic study

Yoshihisa Kotani et al.

Summary: The study compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of OLIF51 and MIS-TLIF for single-level lumbar-sacral fusion, showing that OLIF51 had significant superiority in low back function and segmental lordosis. Both procedures demonstrated equivalent surgical invasiveness.

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Clinical and radiologic comparison of anterior-posterior single- position lateral surgery versus MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Yoshihisa Kotani et al.

Summary: The single-position surgery of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with posterior screwing (OLIF-LPF) provides higher effectiveness rate and better improvement in leg pain for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) treatment, with less posterior disc height correction demonstrated.

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Comparison of clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)

Renjie Li et al.

Summary: The study compared clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balance treated with OLIF and TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Results showed that the OLIF group had better improvement in disc height and foraminal height compared to the TLIF group, and restoration of spino-pelvic sagittal balance was observed in both groups post-surgery.

MEDICINE (2021)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

The Effect of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program on Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease at Short-Term Follow-Up

Wenxiang Chen et al.

Summary: This study compared the therapeutic effects of OLIF and TLIF approaches combined with ERAS for lumbar degenerative diseases, with OLIF showing better results in the short-term follow-up. Overall patient satisfaction was high in both groups with no significant difference between them.

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Xiao-guang Han et al.

Summary: Comparing the effects of robot-assisted OLIF and Mis-TLIF for single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, OLIF group had less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, higher disc height, and higher fusion rates than the Mis-TLIF group. Robots are considered an effective tool for minimally invasive spine surgery.

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2021)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study

Xing Du et al.

Summary: This study compared the efficacy of OLIF and TLIF in single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery, showing that the OLIF group had advantages in operation time, blood loss, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay over the TLIF group, with similar bone fusion rates postoperatively. There were no significant differences in complications between the two groups in long-term follow-up.

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis

Qing-Yi Zhang et al.

Summary: This study compared the clinical and radiographic efficacy of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) and Oblique lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF). The results showed that OLIF had shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, better leg pain alleviation, disc height restoration, and subsidence resistance compared to MIS-TLIF. However, there were no significant differences in back pain relief, functional recovery, complications, disc angle restoration, lumbar lordosis restoration, and fusion rate between the two procedures. Further high-level studies are needed to confirm these findings.

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2021)

Review Clinical Neurology

Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis

Johan L. Heemskerk et al.

Summary: After analyzing 16 studies, it was found that MIS-TLIF and open-TLIF have comparable long-term clinical outcomes. Both surgeries significantly reduce pain and improve PROMs, with no significant differences between the two treatments at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study

Hiromitsu Takaoka et al.

Summary: This study compared the postoperative outcomes of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). It was found that OLIF can maintain corrected disc height but has limited impact on global alignment.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Comparison of outcomes between indirect decompression of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and MIS-TLIF in one single-level lumbar spondylosis

Shih-Feng Hung et al.

Summary: The study compared the efficacy of OLIF and MIS-TLIF in lumbar fusion surgery, showing that OLIF had less blood loss and shorter surgery time, as well as better improvement in segmental lordosis and coronal balance. OLIF also demonstrated superior improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale for back pain at 6 months post-operation.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Comparison of Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Posterior Fixation in Lateral Position and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Yoshinao Koike et al.

Summary: This study compared the physical function and QOL parameters of OLIF-LPF and MIS-TLIF procedures for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis, finding that OLIF-LPF had significant superiority in the psychological domain. Both procedures showed improvements in physical function and QOL parameters.

ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion

Sun-Ren Sheng et al.

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2020)

Article Clinical Neurology

Usefulness of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 Level Compared to Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Hah Yong Mun et al.

JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY (2020)

Article Clinical Neurology

Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Definition, Natural History, Conservative Management, and Surgical Treatment

Mohamad Bydon et al.

NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2019)

Article Orthopedics

Sagittal Balance Correction Following Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of the Three Approaches

Pierre-Olivier Champagne et al.

ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL (2019)

Review Oncology

Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review

David S. Xu et al.

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (2018)

Review Clinical Neurology

A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF

Ian Teng et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE (2017)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

David Moher et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)