Useful functional recovery and quality of life after surgical treatment of peroneal nerve injuries

Closed injuries to the peroneal nerve recover spontaneously in about a third of patients, but surgery may be needed in the remaining 2/3. The recovery after surgery is not always satisfactory and the patients may need an orthosis or a walking aid to cope with regular daily activities. This study aimed to evaluate the useful functional recovery and quality of life (QoL) in surgically treated patients with peroneal nerve (PN) injuries. The study involved 51 patients who have undergone surgical treatment due to PN injury in our department, within a 15-year period (2006-2020). Thirty patients (59%) were treated with neurolysis, 12 (23%) with nerve repair techniques, and 9 (18%) with tendon transfer (TT). Neurolysis is employed in the least extensive nerve injuries when nerve continuity is preserved and yields a motor recovery ratio of almost 80%. Nerve repairs were followed by 58.33% of patients achieving M3+ recovery, while 41.66% recovered to the useful functional state (M4 or M5) With the use of TTs, all patients recovered to the M3+, while 66.7% recovered to M4. All our results correspond to the results of previous studies. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the QoL of the groups. There is an apparent advantage of neurolysis, over nerve repair, over TT procedure, both in terms of useful functional recovery, and foot-drop-related QoL. However, when involving all aspects of QoL, these advantages diminish. The individual approach leads to optimal results in all groups of patients.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the functional recovery and quality of life in surgically treated patients with peroneal nerve injuries. The results showed that neurolysis had advantages over nerve repair and tendon transfer procedures in terms of functional recovery and foot-drop-related quality of life. However, these advantages diminished when considering all aspects of quality of life.