4.7 Article

Evaluating Data Augmentation Effects on the Recognition of Sugarcane Leaf Spot

Journal

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12121997

Keywords

sugarcane disease; image segmentation; deep learning; data augmentation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the recognition and segmentation of plant diseases in complex environments using deep learning. By utilizing data augmentation techniques, the recognition accuracy of the model is improved. The research achieved significant success in this field.
Research on the recognition and segmentation of plant diseases in simple environments based on deep learning has achieved relative success. However, under the conditions of a complex environment and a lack of samples, the model has difficulty recognizing disease spots, or its recognition accuracy is too low. This paper is aimed at investigating how to improve the recognition accuracy of the model when the dataset is in a complex environment and lacks samples. First, for the complex environment, this paper uses DeepLabV3+ to segment sugarcane leaves from complex backgrounds; second, focusing on the lack of training images of sugarcane leaves, two data augmentation methods are used in this paper: supervised data augmentation and deep convolutional generative adversarial networks (DCGANs) for data augmentation. MobileNetV3-large, Alexnet, Resnet, and Densenet are trained by comparing the original dataset, original dataset with supervised data augmentation, original dataset with DCGAN augmentation, background-removed dataset, background-removed dataset with supervised data augmentation, and background-removed dataset with DCGAN augmentation. Then, the recognition abilities of the trained models are compared using the same test set. The optimal network selected based on accuracy and training time is MobileNetV3-large. Classification using MobileNetV3-large trained by the original dataset yielded 53.5% accuracy. By removing the background and adding synthetic images produced by the DCGAN, the accuracy increased to 99%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available