4.7 Review

A Systematic Review of Agricultural Sustainability Indicators

Journal

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13020241

Keywords

sustainable agriculture; PRISMA; SALSA; indicators; Systematic Literature Review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable agriculture aims to produce food and energy for current and future generations and has gained considerable attention in the past 25 years. This study identified 101 indicators from previous research across economic, environmental, and social dimensions. It proposed a set of appropriate indicators and analyzed previous studies based on publication year, continent, and topic.
A rapidly expanding field, sustainable agriculture aims to produce food and energy for people today and future generations. The sustainability concept is different in every field; thus, the indicators are unique in any area and country. Sustainable agriculture contains three main dimensions: economic, environmental, and social. Sustainable agriculture has been the focus of researchers for the past twenty-five years and has attracted much attention. Many researchers tried to identify these dimensions, but there is a lack of new research concerned with grouping all indicators together. Moreover, the indicators will change every year, so the indicators list needs to be frequently updated. This study follows the protocol for SALSA (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Web of Science (WoS) was used for the literature search. A total of 101 indicators were found from previous studies for the three dimensions: social, environment, economic. In order to measure the most important indicators for sustainable agriculture, the paper proposes an appropriate set of indicators, as well as providing the previous papers analyzed by year of publication, continent, and topic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available