4.7 Article

Flavor release from traditional dry-cured pork during oral processing

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE AND HUMAN WELLNESS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 102-110

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.fshw.2022.07.028

Keywords

Food oral processing; Flavor release; Electronic tongue; Sensory evaluation; Taste-active; Dry-cured pork products

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the rate of flavor release in the mouth from traditional dry-cured pork and found that oral processing behavior and salivary release have significant effects on the flavor release of dry-cured pork, which can lead to significant changes in sensory perception during oral processing.
The rate of flavor release in the mouth from traditional dry-cured pork was evaluated in this study. It was hypothesized that a slow steady release of fl avor would occur on chewing and hydration. To test this, high salt dry-cured pork was chewed and held in oral cavity without swallowing for 4 different chewing stages (B, NC30, C30, EC). Saliva and food bolus from 16 healthy subjects were collected during oral processing, and analyzed for saliva flow rate, total saliva protein content, saliva pH, conductivity, saliva and sodium, and taste components. Results show that oral processing behavior and salivary release have important effects on flavor release of dry-cured pork. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis showed that oral processing has a certain effect on the protein composition and concentration in saliva. This study suggests that the interaction between food and saliva that accompanies chewing can lead to significant changes in sensory perception during oral processing.(c) 2023 Beijing Academy of Food Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available