Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A user's guide to inflated and manipulated impact factors
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2019)
Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
Erin C. Mckiernan et al.
ELIFE (2019)
The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact
C. E. Timothy Paine et al.
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2018)
The Impact Factor Fallacy
Frieder M. Paulus et al.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2018)
Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study
Agnes Dechartres et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study
Agnes Dechartres et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review
In-Uck Park et al.
NATURE (2014)
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
Bjoern Brembs et al.
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis
Malgorzata M. Bala et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Magnitude of effects in clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals
Konstantinos C. M. Siontis et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
Howard Balshem et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
Not So Fast: Inflation in Impact Factors Contributes to Apparent Improvements in Journal Quality
Bryan D. Neff et al.
BIOSCIENCE (2010)
Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy
Anne M. Moseley et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Differences in Impact Factor Across Fields and Over Time
Benjamin M. Althouse et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2009)
The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study
Eveline Nueesch et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)
Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review
Anders W. Jorgensen et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2006)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)
Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles
KP Lee et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998
O Olsen et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2001)
Share Paper
