4.6 Article

Protein and RNA ADP-ribosylation detection is influenced by sample preparation and reagents used

Journal

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201455

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Confocal Microscopy Facility, a Core Facility of the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) Aachen within the Faculty of Medicine at RWTH Aachen University
  2. START Program of the Medical Faculty of RWTH Aachen University
  3. German Research Foundation DFG
  4. [LU466/16-2]
  5. [FE1423/3-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the function of ADP-ribosylation in cells and optimizes sample preparation methods, defining the suitable reagents for specific methods and substrates.
The modification of substrates with ADP-ribose (ADPr) is im-portant in, for example, antiviral immunity and cancer. Recently, several reagents were developed to detect ADP-ribosylation; however, it is unknown whether they recognise ADPr, specific amino acid-ADPr linkages, or ADPr with the surrounding protein backbone. We first optimised methods to prepare extracts con-taining ADPr-proteins and observe that depending on the amino acid modified, the modification is heatlabile. We tested the re-activity of available reagents with diverse ADP-ribosylated pro-tein and RNA substrates and observed that not all reagents are equally suited for all substrates. Next, we determined cross -reactivity with adenylylated RNA, AMPylated proteins, and me-tabolites, including NADH, which are detected by some reagents. Lastly, we analysed ADP-ribosylation using confocal microscopy, where depending on the fixation method, either mitochondrion, nucleus, or nucleolus is stained. This study allows future work dissecting the function of ADP-ribosylation in cells, both on protein and on RNA substrates, as we optimised sample prepa-ration methods and have defined the reagents suitable for specific methods and substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available