4.5 Article

Preparation and evaluation of 3 m open tubular capillary columns with a zwitterionic polymeric porous layer for liquid chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 19, Pages 3736-3744

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201600535

Keywords

Liquid chromatography; Open tubular columns; Porous layers; Zwitterionic polymers

Funding

  1. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project [2012YQ120044]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [21235005]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 3 m zwitterionic polymeric porous layer open tubular column (3 m x 25 mu m id x 375 mu m od) with a polymeric porous layer thickness of 4 mu m was fabricated by the copolymerization of [2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl] dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl) ammonium hydroxide and N,N'-methylenebis(acrylamide). The effects of the diameter of the capillary, reaction temperature, and polymerization time on the preparation of the open tubular column were investigated. Characterized by scanning electron microscopy, the zwitterionic layer was observed to be rough and throughout the fused-silica capillary homogenously, which increased the phase ratio. The separation of neutral, basic, and acidic compounds demonstrates the strong hydrophilicity of the poly[2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl] dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl) ammonium hydroxide coating. In addition, the poly[2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl] dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl) ammonium hydroxide porous layer open tubular column was applied for the analysis of flavonoids from the rootstalk of licorice, revealing the potential in separating complex samples. The relative standard deviation of retention time for run-to-run (n = 5), day-to-day (n = 3), and column-to-column (n = 3) of toluene, N, N-dimethylformamide, formamide, and thiourea were below 1.2%, exhibiting good repeatability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available