4.5 Article

Cross-Linked Networks of 1,6-Hexanedithiol with Gold Nanoparticles to Improve Permeation Flux of Polyethersulfone Membrane

Journal

MEMBRANES
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes12121207

Keywords

membrane; surface modification; gold nanoparticles; permeability

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province
  2. Program for 2022 Doctor Fund in Longdong University
  3. [22JR5RM203]
  4. [XYBYZK2220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, polymeric membranes with improved permeability and good rejection have been successfully designed by using gold nanoparticles as modifiers. The modified membranes showed significant enhancement in water flux and good rejection ratio to bovine serum albumin.
It is a great challenge to design and prepare polymeric membranes with excellent permeability and good rejection. In this study, a modifier of gold nanoparticles for crosslinking and self-assembly by 1,6-hexanedithiol is fabricated and used to modify the polyethersulfone membrane as an additive, which forms a uniform porous membrane by liquid-liquid phase conversion technology. The morphology of the membrane is investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the change of the hydrophilicity of the membrane surface after modification is measured by the contact angle goniometer, and the performance of the fabricated membrane is measured by evaluating the pure water flux and the rejection ratio of bovine serum albumin. The results indicate that the permeability of the modified membrane has a significant improvement. When the mass fraction of the modifying agent is 5 wt%, the water flux of the modified membrane reaches up to 131.6 L m(-2) h(-1), and has a good rejection ratio to bovine serum albumin. In short, this work plays an important role in improving the flux of the membrane and maintaining good separation performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available