4.5 Article

Iron Determination in Natural Waters Using a Synthesised 3-Hydroxy-4-Pyridione Ligand in a Newly Developed Microfluidic Paper-Based Device

Journal

CHEMOSENSORS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors11020101

Keywords

iron quantification sensor; microfluidic paper-based analytical device; 3-hydroxy-4-pyridinone ligand; natural waters; in situ analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed an iron sensor based on a microfluidic paper-based technique for quantification of iron in natural waters. A water-soluble naphthalene-3-hydroxy-4-pyridione ligand was used as a colour reagent to form an orange complex with iron. The microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD) assembly was optimized, and under the optimal conditions, a linear correlation was obtained within the range of 0.25-2.00 mg/L of iron.
This work describes the development of an iron sensor based on a microfluidic paper-based technique, to attain iron quantification in natural waters. A new water-soluble naphthalene-3-hydroxy-4-pyridione ligand was used as a colour reagent, as it formed an orange complex with iron. As a newly described ligand, several chemical and physical parameters, namely, the sample and reagent volumes and reagent concentrations, were studied related to the formation of the coloured complex. The microfluidic paper-based analytical device (mu PAD) assembly, namely, the use of different types of filter paper and different numbers of layers, was developed to obtain the best performance. Under the optimal conditions, a linear correlation was obtained in the range of 0.25-2.00 mg/L of iron, with a minimum detectable value of 0.07 mg/L. The proposed mu PAD method was validated by an analysis of the certified samples and by a comparison of the tested water samples with the inductively coupled plasma (ICP) results (RE < 10%). Then, the mu PAD device was successfully applied to the determination of iron in tap water, well water, river water, and seawater, with no need for any prior sample pre-treatment; recovery studies were also performed (average = 100.3% with RSD = 4.2%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available